Plexipave A Failed CRM Implementation Sample Solution

Question: Define Plexipave for A failed CRM implementation. Answer: Introduction It describes the various aspects of the Customer Relationship Management. The objective is to evaluate the critical anlaysis of the customer relationship management in the perspective of the Plexipave implementation. It enables to determine the customer relationship management their relations with enterprise system, explain different process of CRM and wrong with Plexipaves CRM and improvement strategy. Indeed, Plexipave is the producer of acrylic sports surfacing. Acrylic sport surfaces is established in the commercial, agency, tournament locations and residential involving Tennis Asia, the David Cup and Indian Wells. It is the part of California Products Corporation as a producer of coating and paints. It is located in Andover, MA. California started production of the Plexipave. It is the oldest producer of acryulic tennis court surfaces in all over the world. Further, Enterprise system is a big scale software packages that helps business process, reporting, information flows and data analytics in composite company. It has three kinds of enterprise systems such as ERP system, CRM and enterprise planning systems. Plexipave is the correlated with customer relationship management. CRM is the part of enterprise system. So, both are interrelated in their business term at the current market condition. (Motiwalla Thomson 2012). Describe customer relationship management and relation with enterprise system: CRM is a agreement that relates to strategies and technologies to handle data and assisting in customer retention, improving business relationship with customers and forcing sales growth. In the other words, It is designed to collect information on customer variety channels or point of channel between the organization and the customer that involves the organizations, live chat, telephone, direct mail, social media and marketing materials,. Further, The relationship between enterprise and CRM can be complicated for someone who has started searching for CRM solutions for their business. There are several small business person offering many editions, It is an easy to get confused when business required enterprise CRM. Enterprise system CRM solution such as SAP, Salesforce and Microsoft Dynamics are planned for larger and flexible business with customer facing departments databases. It allows for a high degree of automation such as generating alerts when problem increase. (Baran Galka 2 013). Enterprise system can be more expensive as compared to CRM standard. Most of price will be attribute on time and effort involving in customizing the deploying and system. The extra price involves robust support for issues such as creating mobile applications and training. Enterprise system has three types of system such as supply chain management, CRM and enterprise resource planning. Here, CRM was created to find the requirement to increase the sales department productivity. Supply chain management relates to collection of tasks, equipment, data, people and resource required to produce products from vendor to a customer. The enterprise resource planning software integrates business process such as finance, inventory management, purchasing and human resources. In the regard of ERP system, it integrated software modules such as quality management, sales, accounts receivables, share data and communicate. Enterprise system is an useful in the Plexipaves kinds of small business or ganization. It helps to raise the employees productivity, business knowledge and reduce the duplication of organization data. Plexipaves kinds of enterprise system attributes offer specific profit such as improved response to the raised work quality, marketplace, greater staff collaboration, support of teamwork and efficiency. (Kumar Reinartz 2012). [Chart 1, (Source: Motiwalla Thomson 2012)] Determine different process of CRM: CRM process is determined as the activities performed by the company relating the CRM. The purpose of the CRM process is to form customer perception of the company and its products through building customer relationship, developing customer knowledge and indentifying customers. It is the categorized into horizontal and vertical process, back office process, primary secondary process and front-office process. (Fjermestad Robertson 2015). These are the different process of the CRM that is described below: Customer facing level CRM process: It is a process that manage termination, maintenance, customer relationship initiation and across all customers to raise the value of the relationship portfolio. The customer facing CRM process includes relationship maintenance, relationship termination and relationship initiation. (Reinartz, Krafft Hoyer 2004). Further, maintenance process involves the activity that portray customer relationship such as retention program and up cross selling. (Makkar 2012). It is helpful to maintain CRM strategy process in the competitive business environment. So, organization should follow the current process of CRM strategy to survive in the market. Termination process involves bad relationship for used to find and settle on ending. Initiation process involves activity that take place before early stage of the relationship. Furthermore, this context shows the significant of coordinating information across period to handle the whole customer relationship systema tically. It is the significant process of CRM that related with the Plexipaves. (Rababah, Mohd Ibrahim 2011). Customer oriented CRM process: It covers the customer activities performed to satisfy a need to solve a problem. The customer is the king of market and it is the wholesale of the market. So, process should be based on customer oriented that attract people to follow them. The customer oriented CRM process has three kinds of process such as delivery, analysis and support process. CRM deliver process is known as part of customer process involving campaign, service, complaint, sales management process. CRM analysis process is the analyzing the gathored knowledge of CRM process involving lead management, segmentation, feedback, customer profiling and knowledge management. CRM support process deals with supporting objective by the market research process. (Kim Kim 2009). Cross functional CRM process: It is based on holistic approach such as performance assessment process, strategy development process, the information management process, value creation process and multichannel integration process. The value creation process is based on the outputs of the development process. The value of the customer receives, the organization receives, maximizing the lifetime value of desired customer are the significant elements of the value creation process in the perspective of the Plexipave implementation. The strategy development process covers the reciprocal set of strategic process that provides the detail overview of the company strategy. The information management process is collected from develop clear proper marketing responses. Performance assessment process is an assuring of achieving the company strategic objective in terms of CRM. It includes observing of the CRM activities to getting customers feedback regarding CRM implementation in the organization. (Makkar 2012). CRM macro level process: It relate to the undertaken activities of the company to develop market intelligence. The Plexipaves can leverage to construct and survive a profit-raising portfolio. Macro is the part of economic of the country that helps to evaluate the current economy condition. It is helpful to predict the future growth of the organization. The interaction management processs and knowledge management process are dependent on the technological and human resource of the company. (Kim Kim 2009). Knowledge management process has three types such as data collection, intelligence dissemination and intelligence generation, Data collection relate to the collection of information to the customers. The intelligence generation relate to the discussion of the colletion information into desire to be disseminated in the intelligence process across the company to all staff who has relation with customers. (Rababah, Mohd Ibrahim 2011). (Source: Rababah, Mohd Ibrahim 2011) Wrong (failure) with Plexipaves CRM strategy and improvement: These are the significant failure with Plexipaves CRM strategy that is described below: Lack of business will be the reason for CRM implementation failure. The organization should adopt clear strategy for business to run in the competitive market. It is the significant way to survive in the current market. The organization strategy should be customer oriented that attract new customer in the Plexipaves CRM strategy.(Kumar Reinartz 2012). Plexipaves that think CRM software is the CRM. It is not trying to achieve CRM strategy. It should be realized that CRM software is enabler to reach CRM strategy. (Sheth Parvatiyar 2011). Project management or poor planning will not help to CRM implementation failure. But also result in employees job loss. Project management or planning should be handle by the well educated team of the organization. The organization shoul hire some subject specialized employees that can handle technical work perfect manners. A selection of the wrong CRM provider will end up in execution failure. If a provider is chosen lacks expertise, expensive and unable to train staff properly. Then, the CRM execution will be wrong. Sometimes, it may be boil down to personalities. Some providers are attracted with solution. So, they dont spend proper focus on the business requirement of the organization. (Sherif 2009). All staff should belive in the CRM strategy. They should be educated in order to purchase the CRM execution and utilization. Time frame will be not bounded and training will be not appropriate. (Tosovic 2010). Insecure hardware is likely to challenge system and compel political risk while software solution mediate risk and function is outsourced to hosting distributor. Software solution will provide clear way to success in the competitive market. They should provide hardware security to survive in the market challenge system because it is necessary for the safety purpose. (Sherif 2009). The benefits of CRM execution is a clear understanding of the Plexipaves action business. (Sheth Parvatiyar 2011). An unsuccessful data conversion can enforce the new CRM strategy. Existing data desire to converted or migrated the new CRM strategy. Data quality depends on the architecture database. It can be reason for technical problems. (Kumar Reinartz 2012). Wrong with the McGraw-Hill/Siebel-hosted CRM application: Plexipaves bought this hosted CRM and five seats to test the program. The system went live without cover the development of it. The internal users were trained by presentation and computer based training. There were no proper training program that is wrong with McGraw-Hill/Siebel-hosted CRM application. (Fjermestad Robertson 2015). The another main wrong thing with Plexipaves is outside the US. But, McGraw Hil didnt extend its abroad services. So, the hosted CRM followed the suit and enter abroad postal codes. Plexipaves salesman travel field, there is no proper internet facility or technology to integrate the use of remote CRM strategy. They dont provide any guideline that how to operate the software and several lacked the knowledge to understand the strategic benefit that could be dedected from CRM programs. Plexipaves director was wavered due to numerous issues from the salesman that the program developed an unnecessary work. The Doge representative offered extra training and upd ates. The director was explored the executation and as result hosted CRM was a failure. (Liao 2010). Conclusion: On the basis of above analysis, concluded that clear the customer relationship management their relations with enterprise system, different process of CRM and wrong with Plexipaves CRM and improvement strategy as well as high caliber to adopt new technique in Plexipaves helps to achieve its competitive position in the market. It is matter of fact that execute CRM program faced with failure in several sectors. The clear idea about the CRM and its aspect such as scope, process, definition and technology is still limited. The knowledge of the main component of the CRM initiative is significant for success. Recommendation: These are the significant recommendation of the Plaxipaves CRM implementation strategy. Plaxipaves should produce innovative product as per customer choice that help to maintain customer relationship management. Plaxipaves should expand their business market in the worldwide to sale their profitability and sales. It would be beneficial for the Plexipaves growth and development. (Rababah, Mohd Ibrahim 2011). Plaxipaves should focus on marketing about their product features as compare to competitors organization. They should tell customers about extra quality of the product feature of the organization. So, people will prefer to buy them. Plaxipaves should deliver low price with high quality product as compared to competitor organization that would raise the sale of the organization. A high sales generate the revenue of the organization that is helpful in the competitive market to extend their business in the competitive market. (Motiwalla Thomson 2012). References Ahmad, N, Mohammad, 2012, Ontology-Based Applications for Enterprise Systems and Knowledge Management, IGI Global, Melbourne. Baran, RJ, Galka, RJ, 2013, CRM: The Foundation of Contemporary Marketing Strategy, Routledge, Sydney. Blumberg, DF, 2016, Managing High-Tech Services Using a CRM Strategy, CRC Press, Melbourne. Buttle, F, Maklan, S, 2015, Customer Relationship Management: Concepts and Technologies, Routledge, Sydney. Fjermestad, J, Robertson NC, 2015, Electronic Customer Relationship Management, Routledge, Sydney. Giachetti, RE, 2016, Design of Enterprise Systems: Theory, Architecture, and Methods, CRC Press, Sydney. Kim, HS, and Kim, YG, 2009, A CRM performance measurement framework: Its development process and application, Industrial marketing management, 38(4), pp.477-489. Knox, S, Payne, A, Ryals, L, Maklan, S, and Peppard, J, 2007, Customer relationship management, Routledge, Sydney. Kumar, V, Reinartz, W, 2012, Customer Relationship Management: Concept, Strategy, and Tools, Springer Science Business Media, New York. Lairson, MG, 2010, Oracle Crm On Demand Dashboards, Tata McGraw-Hill Inc, Sydney. Liao, H, 2010, April. SaaS business model for software enterprise, In Information Management and Engineering (ICIME), 2010 The 2nd IEEE International Conference on (pp. 604-607). Makkar, 2012, Customer Relationship Management, Tata McGraw-Hill Education, Sydney. Motiwalla, Thomson, 2012, Enterprise Systems for Management, Pearson Education Inc. New York. Rababah, K, Mohd, H, Ibrahim, H, 2011, Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Processesfrom Theory to Practice: The Pre-implementation Plan ofCRM System, International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 1(1), p.22. Sheth, JN, Parvatiyar, A, 2011, Customer relationship management: Emerging practice, process, and discipline, Journal of Economic and Social research, 3(2), pp.1-34. Tosovic, V, 2010, Strategic use of CRM, diplom.de, Sydney. Sherif, MH, 2009, Handbook of Enterprise Integration, CRC Press, Sydney. Umar, A, 2014, Third Generation Distributed Computing Environments, nge solutions, inc, Melbourne.